刘鹏教授

教授 硕士生导师

出生日期:

电子邮箱:

入职时间:2014-12-31

所在单位:公共管理学院(应急管理学院)

学历:博士研究生毕业

办公地点:

性别:男

联系方式:liupeng@nwu.edu.cn

学位:理学博士学位

在职信息:在职

主要任职:

其他任职:

毕业院校:

所属院系:

学科: 公共管理其他专业应用心理学

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 论文成果

Arousal modulates the motor interference effect stimulated by pictures of threatening animals

点击次数:

影响因子:2.284

DOI码:10.7717/peerj.10876

所属单位:公共管理学院

教研室:心理学

发表刊物:PeerJ

摘要:Previous research related to the motor interference effect from dangerous objects indicated that delayed responses to dangerous objects were associated with more positive parietal P3 amplitudes, suggesting that great attentional resources were allocated to evaluate the level of danger (i.e., negative valence). However, arousal covaried with valence in this research. Together with previous studies in which the P3 amplitude was found to be increased along with a higher arousal level in the parietal lobe, we raised the issue that more positive parietal P3 amplitudes might also be affected by a high arousal level. To clarify whether valence or arousal impacted the motor interference effect, this study used a motor priming paradigm mixed with a Go/NoGo task and manipulated the valence (negative, neutral and positive) and arousal (medium and high) of target stimuli. Analysis of the behavioral results identified a significant motor interference effect (longer reaction times (RTs) in the negative valence condition than in the neutral valence condition) at the medium arousal level and an increased effect size (increment ofRT difference) at the high arousal level. The results indicated that negative valence stimuli may interfere with the prime elicited motor preparation more strongly at the high arousal level than at the medium arousal level. The ERP results identified larger centroparietal P3 amplitudes for the negative valence condition than for the neutral valence condition at a high arousal level. However, the inverse result, i.e., lower centroparietal P3 amplitudes for the negative valence condition than for the neutral valence condition, was observed at a medium arousal level. The ERP results further indicated that the effect size of the behavioral motor interference effect increased because subjects are more sensitive to the negative valence stimuli at the high arousal level than at the medium arousal level. Furthermore, the motor interference effect is related to the negative valence rather than emotionality of the target stimuli because different result patterns emerged between the positive and negative valence conditions. Detailed processes underlying the interaction between valence and arousal effects are discussed.

论文类型:期刊论文

论文编号:e10876

学科门类:教育学

一级学科:心理学

卷号:9

字数:8017

是否译文:

发表时间:2021-02-11

收录刊物:SCI

发布期刊链接:https://peerj.com/articles/10876/

通讯作者:刘鹏

上一条: Imitation of Touching Dangerous Animals Triggers Motor Inhibition in a Primed Target Grasping- Categorization Task

下一条: Why Do you Often Stop your Impulsive Behavior at the Last Moment?